<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Housekeeping (3 Comments)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.artistegullible.com/travelblog/2009/02/20/housekeeping/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.artistegullible.com/travelblog/2009/02/20/housekeeping/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 13:27:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.artistegullible.com/travelblog/2009/02/20/housekeeping/comment-page-1/#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artistegullible.com/travelblog/?p=133#comment-88</guid>
		<description>Sweet. Well I&#039;m set as a regular visitor no matter how it turns out.

Thanks for the good work so far, and long may it continue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sweet. Well I&#8217;m set as a regular visitor no matter how it turns out.</p>
<p>Thanks for the good work so far, and long may it continue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.artistegullible.com/travelblog/2009/02/20/housekeeping/comment-page-1/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artistegullible.com/travelblog/?p=133#comment-87</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link Lazlo. At my present bandwith limits I am not so concerned about the direct link back. As i have said I am getting more free advertising for the site than what it might cost me if bandwidth were and issue. Hopefully, I will get to a point where I am concerned about all those pictures I am feeding. I would much rather have too much credit via a hot link, than no link at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link Lazlo. At my present bandwith limits I am not so concerned about the direct link back. As i have said I am getting more free advertising for the site than what it might cost me if bandwidth were and issue. Hopefully, I will get to a point where I am concerned about all those pictures I am feeding. I would much rather have too much credit via a hot link, than no link at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.artistegullible.com/travelblog/2009/02/20/housekeeping/comment-page-1/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artistegullible.com/travelblog/?p=133#comment-86</guid>
		<description>Re: the link from the scuba diving forum.

That would have been me - posting under a psuedonym (Lazlo).

I hope you didn&#039;t mind the &quot;hot link&quot; to your material (and I was careful to leave a proper (real) link to your site). Why might you mind? Because some sites, once they get to a certain level of popularity frown on the practice - they accuse their readers of &quot;stealing bandwidth&quot;. I can see the point - as traffic increases, so does the hosting cost.

The alternative is to make a copy of the picture, host it separately and post that, and (assuming that the poster cares about such things) include a hyperlink to the original source. Do you have a preference? If so, it might be worth putting it up somewhere...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: the link from the scuba diving forum.</p>
<p>That would have been me &#8211; posting under a psuedonym (Lazlo).</p>
<p>I hope you didn&#8217;t mind the &#8220;hot link&#8221; to your material (and I was careful to leave a proper (real) link to your site). Why might you mind? Because some sites, once they get to a certain level of popularity frown on the practice &#8211; they accuse their readers of &#8220;stealing bandwidth&#8221;. I can see the point &#8211; as traffic increases, so does the hosting cost.</p>
<p>The alternative is to make a copy of the picture, host it separately and post that, and (assuming that the poster cares about such things) include a hyperlink to the original source. Do you have a preference? If so, it might be worth putting it up somewhere&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

